Skip to main content
Topic: Swapping out the 3.8 (Read 5243 times) previous topic - next topic

Swapping out the 3.8

Hey guys,
I recently had a head gasket blow out on my '85. The engine started to overheat as well. My mechanic says it's probably going to need a new head.  My thinking is, what's to say that I won't have another head gasket blow out sometime. I've been thinking about maybe going a different route and swapping in a 5.0 I'm just wondering what all it would take to make it work?
Cornfed85

1985 Thunderbird - 3.8 V6, C5  :ford:  :birdsmily:


Swapping out the 3.8

Reply #2
Cool, thanks! I think the same basic principles will still apply, but I was actually thinking about using a 70s-early 80s carbed 302.
Cornfed85

1985 Thunderbird - 3.8 V6, C5  :ford:  :birdsmily:

Swapping out the 3.8

Reply #3
So, the 5.0 swap is definitely happening. I need to find a decent, halfway low mileage engine.
Cornfed85

1985 Thunderbird - 3.8 V6, C5  :ford:  :birdsmily:

Swapping out the 3.8

Reply #4
I was just offered a chance to buy a turbo 2.3 from the college I go to. How easy would it be to put one in a V6 car? Can my C5 hook up to it?
Cornfed85

1985 Thunderbird - 3.8 V6, C5  :ford:  :birdsmily:

Swapping out the 3.8

Reply #5
Quote from: Cornfed85;451224
I was just offered a chance to buy a turbo 2.3 from the college I go to. How easy would it be to put one in a V6 car? Can my C5 hook up to it?


Going to/from the 2.3T in anything other than a NA 2.3 Stang or Ranger is far more work than from/to V6 or V8... You'll need all sorts of unique pieces like throttle linkage, intake plumbing, VAM, computer and it's wiring(that's necessary for any swap) etc, etc...

BTW, no a C5 won't fit a 2.3, even T-5 are different(input shaft & gear ratios), but can be made to work...

Swapping out the 3.8

Reply #6
Ok. I guess it's back to finding a V8.
Cornfed85

1985 Thunderbird - 3.8 V6, C5  :ford:  :birdsmily:

Swapping out the 3.8

Reply #7
There are literally millions of 5.0 engines out there...some of the newer ones from say, Explorers, etc can go several hundred thousand miles and only need basic tune-up parts. My '97 Mountaineer has 260K on the clock....I'd get in it and not be afraid to drive to either ocean, and engine wise, it would make provided I stopped every 120 miles for another tank of gas.


(It's the rear that scares me...lots of play in the axles and she's got a howl when I get in it. He he he...sounds dirty, but... ;)
'84 Mustang
'98 Explorer 5.0
'03 Focus, dropped a valve seat. yay. freakin' split port engines...
'06 Explorer EB 4.6

Swapping out the 3.8

Reply #8
I am looking to get a 1970's 302/351. Will it bolt up to my C5? Also, will my wiring (alternator, etc.) work for a '70s engine? I know I won't need the ECU anymore.
Cornfed85

1985 Thunderbird - 3.8 V6, C5  :ford:  :birdsmily:

Swapping out the 3.8

Reply #9
Yes the C5 will hook up to the 302 , but it will need to have some work done to it.you will also need to change the flexplate and torque converter.
If it were me , I would go with the c4 , you would have more money in the C5, than you can buy a C4 for.

I am running a C5 behind a 1969 302.
Never drive faster than your guardian angel can fly.
:birdsmily: :birdsmily: :birdsmily::birdsmily: 
  [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
:birdsmily: :birdsmily: :birdsmily::birdsmily:
1983 base model,1969 302 (originally a v6),upraded c5,currently 30,441 original miles.

Swapping out the 3.8

Reply #10
I just found a 1968 302 with a C4. What all would need to be done to make the C4 work? I assume it probably wouldn't just drop in.
Cornfed85

1985 Thunderbird - 3.8 V6, C5  :ford:  :birdsmily:

Swapping out the 3.8

Reply #11
Actually, I'm thinking about going with an '80s 5.0 swap. I found ECUs that aren't very expensive. Now I just need to find a V8 ECU harness and '86 V8 motor mounts and then I'll be set to get the engine.
Cornfed85

1985 Thunderbird - 3.8 V6, C5  :ford:  :birdsmily:


Swapping out the 3.8

Reply #13
I've heard mixed reviews on the AOD. Some people say they work fine, other people say they're plagued with problems. Early overdrives have a bad reputation. Not just the AOD, but the early Torqueflight overdrives, and the GM 700R4s.
Cornfed85

1985 Thunderbird - 3.8 V6, C5  :ford:  :birdsmily: